From: Etienne Vallette d'Osia <dohzya@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:30:43 GMT
Subject: Re: Improve tags
Message-ID: <49CCAAD3.4070104@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49CBA713.4040605@drmicha.warpmail.net>

 > You described your motivation and use case very clearly!
 >
 > Maybe "label" would be an appropriate name for "non-unique tags". I
 > assume they should be local and non-versioned. It sounds as if a file
 > storing a list of sha1s could be the simplest approach (one file per
 > label in a new subdir of .git), although this may not scale well. A
 > first step could be implementing a command "git label" in shell which
 > sets and displays labels. Later on, various builtins would need to be
 > taught about it if you want labels displayed in log etc.
 >
 > Michael

Thanks a lot

"label" is perfect !

In fact, I was thinking about non-local labels.
But keeping information in a separate file and not in commit directly is 
a very nice idea (and closer than the current tag implementation).
I love your approach, you have just make this idea realizable