From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:05:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [BUG] test_must_fail: does not correctly detect failures - Was Git 2.16.0-rc2 Test Summary on NonStop
Message-ID: <499fb29f-ca34-8d28-256d-896107c29a3e@kdbg.org>
In-Reply-To: <007901d38da9$d517e9e0$7f47bda0$@nexbridge.com>

Am 15.01.2018 um 03:37 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
> On January 14, 2018 4:33 PM, I wrote:
>> The exotic error code coming back from perl is 162. I can muck with it, if
>> there was a value more useful to git.
>> *  553          } else if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
>> *  554                  code = WEXITSTATUS(status);
>> (eInspect 3,887):p code
>> $4 = 162
>>
>> The perl code uses die to terminate with a non-specific non-zero error code.
>> What it seems is that there is an assumed value that the git tests depend on,
>> but perl.org describes the following:
>>
>> "die raises an exception. Inside an eval the error message is stuffed into $@
>> and the eval is terminated with the undefined value. If the exception is
>> outside of all enclosing evals, then the uncaught exception prints LIST to
>> STDERR and exits with a non-zero value. If you need to exit the process with
>> a specific exit code, see exit."

I take "die exits with non-zero" as a piece of information for the 
*users* so that they can write "if perl foo.pl; then something; fi" in 
shell scripts. I do *not* interpret it as leeway for implementers of 
perl to choose any random value as exit code. Choosing 162 just to be 
funky would be short-sighted. [I'm saying all this without knowing how 
perl specifies 'die' beyond the paragraph you cited. Perhaps there's 
more about 'die' that justifies exit code 162.] I'd say that the perl 
port is broken.

>>
>> So it seems that we might need to either not use die or change the tests not
>> to care about the exit code for specific tests involving perl. Suggestions?
> 
> Sadly, while changing the funky 162 completion code to 255 works
> fine for t9001, it causes a bunch of other tests to fail (parts of
> 1308 and most of 1404). I can't tall whether this is test suite or
> code related but I'm caught in the middle. Going to the platform
> developers may eventually get the fix for t9001 (fixing perl), but
> otherwise, I'm not sure why changing 162 to 255 causes 1308 and 1404
> to blow so badly. In any event, I'm putting this away for a few days
> due to $DAYJOB.

Why do you not choose 1? He, on my Linux box perl -e die exits with 255. 
So...

-- Hannes