From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:54:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [irq/urgent]: created 3786fc7: "irq: make variable static"
Message-ID: <48FEF868.2010802@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <20081022090010.GC4369@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:
> 
>> I imagine you'd want to use it to find out which branches you can (or 
>> can't) merge, and in that case you need to know about all the topics 
>> which have the commit. Assuming you don't go crazy cherry-picking and 
>> criss-cross merging, it should only list a few. The output is not as 
>> fancy as below, but it should be faster than the appended script (by 
>> several orders of magnitude).
> 
> i solved that particular problem quite well, based on suggestions in a 
> thread earlier on the git-list. I'm using git branch --no-merged:
> 
>  earth4:~/tip> time todo-merge-all
>  merging the following updated branches:
>  merging linus ... ... merge done.
> 
>  real    0m2.865s
>  user    0m2.580s
>  sys     0m0.228s
> 
> that work step used to be over a minute! There are 233 topic branches at 
> the moment and 18 integration branches. Kudos for making this go really 
> fast in 1.6.0.
> 
> the thing i'm after is to see the originator branch of changes. "git 
> name-rev" was suggested by Santi Béjar in this thread and that is 
> exactly what i need - i'll try to integrate it into some git-log-ish 
> output tool.
> 
> One thing i noticed is that 'git name-rev' can be quite slow for certain 
> commits:
> 
>  earth4:~/tip> time git name-rev 948f984
>  948f984 tags/tip-safe-poison-pointers-2008-05-26_08_52_Mon~1
> 
>  real    0m2.181s
>  user    0m2.068s
>  sys     0m0.092s
> 
> Which seems natural since it might have to dive back into history and 
> cross-reference it to all names. (there's 400 branches and 450 tags in 
> this tree, so i'm certainly pushing things!)
> 
> But if i use that in my git-log-line summary tool it might become 
> quadratic overhead (or worse) very quickly, with minutes of runtime.
> 

What's the timing for "git branch --contains 948f984" ?

"git name-rev" parses a lot more just to be able to print a pretty
short-name (the reversed "git describe") for you to use.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231