From: Scott Wood Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:38:57 GMT Subject: Re: git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch Message-ID: <48C59B71.3040902@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <20080908212717.GA21338@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Anton Vorontsov wrote: > I always thought that posting "-M" patches to the public lists is > discouraged since it is quite difficult to apply them via patch(1). > Also think of non-git users... I think the substantially enhanced reviewability trumps non-git-users who can follow the rename instructions manually (or fix up their patch utility) if they insist on shunning tools that would make their life easier. > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ae5708e > [...] > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma_64.c > deleted file mode 100644 > index ae5708e..0000000 > > That is, if hashes match then it was pure rename. I suppose, though it's not as easy to spot, and won't help in showing what the differences are if there are any. -Scott