From: H. Peter Anvin Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:14:59 GMT Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins Message-ID: <48B46443.6000800@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20080826182349.0a1a75e2@hyperion.delvare> Jean Delvare wrote: > > Reducing /usr/bin in size was totally worthwhile. Maybe not to you, but > to the silent majority I am a proud member of, it was. (I'm not saying > that the path that was taken to get there was optimal, just that the > goal was sound.) > You keep trying to use the Nixon argument ("silent majority.") You *do* know that it was a rhetorical device used by Nixon's speechwriters to push ahead with policies despite compact opposition, don't you? As far as I can tell, most of the arguments in favour came from fanbois of $OTHER_SCM which went along the lines of "why does git need all this stuff in /usr/bin, when $OTHER_SCM doesn't?" It had nothing to do with reality, of course; it was just a difference between git and $OTHER_SCM which they choose to pick on. -hpa