From: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:01:15 GMT
Subject: Re: git-bisect: weird usage of read(1)
Message-ID: <48A0705B.3030107@lsrfire.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20080811164945.GI32184@machine.or.cz>

Petr Baudis schrieb:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:59:32PM +0100, Reece Dunn wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Francis Moreau wrote:
>>>>>               case "$(read yesno)" in [Nn]*) exit 1 ;; esac
>> does not work as expected. Replacing this with
>>
>>                case "$(read yesno; echo $yesno)" in [Nn]*) exit 1 ;; esac
>>
>> would work as intended, as Mikael has pointed out.
> 
>   Wouldn't it be more elegant to
> 
> 	case "$(head -n 1)" in [Nn]*) exit 1 ;; esac

Only if head is a built-in, otherwise you fork needlessly.  Not that
this is a performance critical part, but I wouldn't call it "elegant".

What's wrong with the following variant, already used a few lines up in
the file?

	read yesno
	case "$yesno" in [Nn]*) exit 1 ;; esac

René