From: Boaz Harrosh Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:12:58 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] cmd_reset: don't trash uncommitted changes unless told to Message-ID: <48620C1A.6000509@panasas.com> In-Reply-To: <7vwskea2ik.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano wrote: > Steven Walter writes: > >> @@ -225,6 +243,10 @@ int cmd_reset(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >> if (reset_type == HARD && is_bare_repository()) >> die("hard reset makes no sense in a bare repository"); >> >> + if (reset_type == HARD && !force && index_is_dirty()) { >> + die("Uncommitted changes; re-run with -f to trash them"); >> + } >> + > > Please don't. With your change, does the testsuite even pass? > > "reset --hard" has *ALWAYS* meant to be destructive --- discarding > potential local cruft is the whole point of the operation. > I was under the impression that --hard means working-directory-also as opposed to tree-and-index-only. Nothing to do with destructive-discarding. If it is then something is missing. I need 2 distinct functions. You combine to functions under one command. > Learn the lingo, and get over it. > I did lern the lingo and got bitten. I wanted to do one thing also got the other one. there is: git-reset --clean - destructive-discarding any local changes git-reset --hard - move tree index and working directory to new head How can I separate between them, Please Boaz