From: Lea Wiemann <lewiemann@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:05:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cat-file --batch / --batch-check: do not exit if hashes are missing
Message-ID: <484C73DA.10804@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0806090033030.1783@racer>

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Lea Wiemann wrote:
>> -	if (type <= 0)
>> -		return 1;
>> +	if (type <= 0) {
>> +		printf("%s missing\n", obj_name);
>> +		fflush(stdout);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
> 
> Is it really intended that it returns 0 now?

Yes, return 0 causes it to not exit (which is the desired effect, as in 
documented).

> Further, should it not be an error("%s missin...  instead?  It is an 
> error, isn't it?

No, it's not an error.  I suggest you read git-cat-file.1 -- getting a 
response of "<object> missing" (rather than cat-file terminating) if you 
pass in a non-existent object is the desired behavior, and it happened 
before for named objects, like "HEAD", but not for full hashes.  Now it 
also happens for full hashes.

-- Lea