From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:18:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move all dashed form git commands to libexecdir
Message-ID: <474FB938.3040209@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <20071130011748.GC11683@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:13:04PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> 
>>> My point is that (2) is already implemented for every program (shell or
>>> no) which understands filename completion, and there is a proposal for
>>> taking it away. I would consider that, except I haven't see any claimed
>>> advantages except that the hardlinks are awful under Windows.
>> Weren't enough complaints about Git having waaaaaaaaaaay too many 
>> commands?  Didn't those complaints come about often enough already?
>>
>> 	$ git-[tab]
>> 	Display all 135 possibilities? (y or n)
> 
> Go back and read the thread to which you are responding. I am _not_
> arguing against moving those commands to $(libexecdir) where no sane
> user will ever see them. That change addresses the issue you are talking
> about.
> 
> I _am_ arguing against removing them entirely, for those of us who want
> to go to the trouble of enabling this (by putting a non-standard entry
> into our PATH). Because the issue you are talking about will already
> have been dealt with, it is no longer a compelling reason to remove the
> hardlinks entirely.
> 
> The only reason I have heard to remove them entirely is that Windows
> doesn't properly support hardlinks, which I addressed in my other mails
> (and to which I have seen no rebuttal).
> 

It would provide a ui inconsistency between platforms. Several people
pointed that out. It's decidedly a Bad Thing.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231