From: Andreas Ericsson Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:52:49 GMT Subject: Re: Adding push configuration to .git/config Message-ID: <47453551.3060502@op5.se> In-Reply-To: Steffen Prohaska wrote: > > On Nov 22, 2007, at 2:48 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Nico -telmich- Schottelius >> writes: >> >>> Nice would be >>> >>> [branch "master"] >>> remote-push = origin >>> remote-push-merge = another_branch >>> >>> And thus perhaps also changing the existing specs: >>> >>> remote = ... to remote-fetch = ... >>> merge = ... to remote-fetch-merge = >> >> I do not think doing this is worth it, not because I think a >> single branch.$name.remote should be good enough for everybody, >> but because once you need a separate remote each for fetching >> and pushing, there is no reason to say one per direction is >> enough. >> >> An alternative could be to split [remote "name"] url into two >> variants, fetch-url and push-url. While fetching by default >> from two places without telling from which one does not make any >> sense, pushing by default to two different places is quite a >> normal thing to do, and we already do support more than one url >> entries in [remote "name"] section used for pushing. >> >> If we were to do this, it might also make sense to rename the >> word 'origin' we use for the default remote name to 'default' or >> something. People with shared repository workflow would fetch >> from one repository and push back to the same repository, so the >> distinction would not matter, but for others who need something >> like you suggest, the default repository for fetching and >> pushing are different, and while you may still consider where >> you fetch from your 'origin', where you push into is not your >> 'origin' anymore. > > I like this idea. > I don't. It's troublesome enough to try to teach the finer points of git to my co-workers without different defaults between versions. So far we're getting around the problem by the relatively crude expedient of forcing everyone to update to the latest stable from master each time I say so. It works, but doesn't scale too well, and since every major distro now ships git packages, it would be nice if default-names at least settled down and were only changed with new major releases (that is, from 1.x to 2.x). On the other hand, I'm sure we'll cope whatever you decide. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231