From: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:24:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Bisect dunno
Message-ID: <471250BC.7070307@trolltech.com>
In-Reply-To: <522E90CF-FC15-472F-B0A8-91C310CAF9BF@wincent.com>

Wincent Colaiuta said the following on 14.10.2007 18:35:
> El 14/10/2007, a las 18:25, David Kastrup escribió:
>> René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
>> 
>>> Christian Couder schrieb:
>>>> I choosed "dunno" because that was what Dscho suggested in
>>>> this thread:
>>>> 
>>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/53584/
>>>>  focus=53595
>>>> 
>>>> It seems to me short and understandable at the same time.
>>>> 
>>>> More meaningfull would be "untestable" or "cannottest" or 
>>>> "canttest" but it's much longer, while "good" and "bad" are
>>>> short.
>>> Ugly?  Neutral?
>> "Ugly" has a certain charm to it but would probably not translate
>>  well.  "Limbo" would be another such candidate, probably with
>> better translatability.  But while some of those have some geeky
>> appeal, I really think something reasonably plain like
>> "undecided" would be better in the long run.
> 
> "undecided" sounds good to me. It should be clear to non-native 
> speakers of English (at least, clearer than "dunno").

What about just "unknown"?

-- 
.marius