From: Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 12:02:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Make boundary characters for --color-words configurable
Message-ID: <46dff0320805050502l5a456b69oe621ebad28b8eb63@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805051249520.30431@racer>

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >         The quick,
>  > >         brown fox
>  > >
>  > >  vs
>  > >
>  > >         The fast
>  > >         , brown fox
>  > >
>  > >  IMHO the layout of the new version should be retained, i.e.
>  > >
>  > >         The /quick/fast/
>  > >         , brown fox
>  > >
>  > >  should be shown.
>  >
>  > Why not
>  >
>  >   The <r>quick</r><g>fast</g><r>,</r>
>  >   <g>,</g>brown fox
>
>  I might well be a complete idiot, but your <r></r><something> example is
>  way harder for me to read than my example.
>
>  And of course your example would still be wrong: the "quick" and the comma
>  would not be separated at all.

So i am an idiot too -:). Should be

 The /quick,/fast/
 //, /brown fox


-- 
Ping Yin