From: Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 09:23:10 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make words boundary for --color-words configurable
Message-ID: <46dff0320805020223g497bee82o7bd21d530df9f6de@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080502081408.GA11420@mithlond.arda.local>

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote (2008-05-02 08:45 +0100):
>

>  In general, my opinion is that with international text it's better to
>  define word boundary characters than trying to maintain a _huge_ list of
>  characters used within words in different human languages.
>

Agreed, there is no easy way to designate such a huge list of
non-ascii characters. Even if we figure out one way, the user may
still be scared by such a huge list or the character class syntax.

I think doing this complex both the implementation and the representation.

Instead, if using non word characters, the user only needs specify a
small list of characters (ascii or wide character). instead of the
nearly whole set.


-- 
Ping Yin