From: Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:15:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix "diff --raw" on the work tree side
Message-ID: <46dff0320803020915u565ce50eraa663f9e5a795b81@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v7igloxtu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 3/3/08, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> "Ping Yin" <pkufranky@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> The second patch fixes the inconsistency between "git-diff --raw" and
> >>  "git-diff-{index,files} --raw" when they are used for submodules.
> >>
> >>  The third one is a bit controversial and changes the semantics and
> >>  existing callers and won't be considered for 1.5.5.
> >>
> > Unfortunately, my submodule summary patch series will depend on
> > git-diff or git-diff-index. So should i resend my improved patch only
> > after the thrid one is applied?
>
> I do not think re-introducing the inconsistency like the third one does is
> a palatable option.
>
> Wouldn't grabbing (cd $submodule && git rev-parse HEAD) yourself be more
> portable across git before and after the bugfix of "git diff --raw"?
>

OK, i will parse it myself


-- 
Ping Yin