From: Martin Langhoff Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:10:28 GMT Subject: blame follows renames, but log doesn't Message-ID: <46a038f90706181810p716f914al4d9abba5bfe7eb5@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, when I show git to newbies or demo it to people using other SCMs, and we get to the rename part of the conversation, I discuss and show how GIT's approach is significantly better than explicit recording of renames. One great example is git-blame -- actually more spectacular with the recent git gui blame improvements. But git-log still doesn't do it. If I say git blame git-cvsimport.perl # goes to the true origin like a champ git log git-cvsimport.perl # stops at the Big Tool Rename In thread in May Linus posted a PoC patch to get git-blame to do it http://marc.info/?l=git&m=117347893211567&w=2 , and outlined the reasons why it'd be wrong to try to do that in git-log -- but it didn't come to happen :-/ cg-log used to have some Perl logic that could do this -- it didn't always work, but I'm sometimes tempted to go back to it, and review it. Linus said: > But it's an example of the fact that yes, git can do this, but we're so > stupid that we don't really accept it. And I'm sure people can cope with git blame --log path/to/file and we can add a note to git-log manpage about renames being reported by blame instead. And I kind of hate having to reply to things like these http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/125 cheers martin