From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:22:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introducing cg-xxdiff for conflict resolution
Message-ID: <46a038f90609241022i6ac11da1o1a1cba199595d036@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060924171246.GY13132@pasky.or.cz>

On 9/24/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> In that case I think the most natural way for this tool to interface
> would be in part of some kind of cg-resolve swiss-army knife for
> resolving conflicts:
>
>        cg-resolve --mine       for taking just the version from _my_
>                                side of the merge
>        cg-resolve --other      dtto for the other side of the merge
>        cg-resolve -g           graphically resolve
>                                (vimdiff/xxdiff/meld/...)
>        surely more would be invented over time

Sounds reasonable. But I think we have to keep in mind that you only
know if the conflict is nasty after you have a go at fixing it. And I
sometimes find that I try with cg-xxdiff... and I go back to the plain
old conflict. That is why it doesn't clobber the file -- to protect a
manual merge in process.

> Well, all the Cogito scripts should have some consistent form. :-)

heh - consistency? overrated! ;-)

> But I can adjust such details when applying your patch.

Great! -- I'm travelling and at an airport "free access" computer. It
should be illegal to run airports without free wifi in this day and
age.

cheers,


martin