From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:27:24 GMT
Subject: Re: Unresolved issues #2 (shallow clone again)
Message-ID: <46a038f90605071627i6a335f61lf5e35291bfbe340c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060507120149.40e9f749.vsu@altlinux.ru>

On 5/7/06, Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru> wrote:
> For linux v2.6.16:
>
> 7,3M commits-b41b04a36afebdba3b70b74f419fc7d97249bd7f.pack
>  24M commits_trees-8397f1c2a885527acd07e2caa8c95df626451493.pack
>  97M full-c7b2747a674ff55cb4a59dabebe419f191e360df.pack

With this pack arrangement, do you get any noticeable difference in
walking commits? How about walking commits+trees with git-log <path> ?

I wonder whether segregating packs by object type would make things better...

cheers,



martin