From: Quy Tonthat Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:37:55 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix break in git-rev-list.txt Message-ID: <46CC4A43.9050305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7vbqczkhvb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Hmph. Interesting. The text around this is: > > -g, --wark-reflogs:: > > Indented first paragraph... > + > With '\--pretty' fromat ... second paragraph ... > prefixed with this information on the same line. > + > Cannot be combined with --reverse. > > And its formatted form looks like either (without your patch): > > > > Indented first paragraph... > With --pretty format ... > > Cannot be combined with --reverse. > > > > or (with): > > > > Indented first paragraph... > With --pretty format ... > Cannot be combined with --reverse. > > > > Well, it goes differently on my system here (asciidoc 8.1.0), as shown in the diff bellow: --- git-rev-list.xml.bad 2007-08-23 00:08:58.000000000 +1000 +++ git-rev-list.xml.good 2007-08-23 00:10:20.000000000 +1000 @@ -509,16 +509,15 @@ When this option is used you cannot specify commits to exclude (that is, ^commit, commit1..commit2, nor commit1…commit2 notations cannot be used). - With --pretty format other than oneline (for obvious reasons), this causes the output to have two extra lines of information taken from the reflog. By default, commit@{Nth} notation is used in the output. When the starting commit is specified as instead. Under --pretty=oneline, the commit message is prefixed with this information on the same line. - -Cannot be combined with --reverse. +Cannot be combined with --reverse. + Note the extra which what xmlto has problems with as in its error messages /work/devel/git/git.git/Documentation/git-rev-list.xml:512: element literal: validity error : Element emphasis is not declared in literal list of possible children I'll have a look at asciidoc as soon as I have some time. Quy