From: Andreas Ericsson Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:57:31 GMT Subject: Re: [BUG] OSX ends with "install: git-init.1: No such file or directory" Message-ID: <45A60A0B.5000001@op5.se> In-Reply-To: <7vmz4q5abe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Junio C Hamano wrote: > merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes: > >> If I cd into Documentation, and try to make "git-init.1", I get this: >> >> % make git-init.1 >> asciidoc -b docbook -d manpage -f asciidoc.conf git-init.txt >> xmlto -m callouts.xsl man git-init.xml >> Note: meta date : No date. Using generated date git-init-db >> Note: meta source : No productname or alternative git-init-db >> Note: meta source : No refmiscinfo@class=source git-init-db >> Note: meta version: No productnumber or alternative git-init-db >> Note: meta version: No refmiscinfo@class=version git-init-db >> Warn: meta source : No valid fallback. Leaving empty git-init-db >> Note: meta manual : No ancestor with title git-init-db >> Note: meta manual : No refmiscinfo@class=manual git-init-db >> Warn: meta manual : No valid fallback. Leaving empty git-init-db >> Note: Writing git-init-db.1 >> rm git-init.xml >> >> That's not good. Making git-init-db when it wants git-init. > > Not good. I am _very_ tempted to do this. > Perhaps, but "git init-db" does a lot more than just initialise the object database (such as setting default config-variables, installing template hooks...). "git init" is actually a more sensible name now adays. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231