From: Steven Grimm Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:14:50 GMT Subject: git-svn: follow parent after the fact? Message-ID: <45873D0A.1040804@midwinter.com> One of the other git users here just noticed that his git-svn clone of a particular svn repo has an inconsistent set of files compared to the svn client. Turns out the repo has had its trunk moved around in the past. A fresh clone with --follow-parent (which he didn't use) produces the correct results. Obviously he can blow away his current repo and make a new one, but it'd be nicer if he could preserve his local change history. Is there any way to retroactively apply the additional changes --follow-parent would have applied if it had been used on the initial fetch? It would be better, IMO, if you didn't have to figure out whether or not a given remote svn repository has had branch renames in the past in order to figure out if you need to provide an extra option to git-svn fetch. Maybe --follow-parent should be the default behavior and there should be an option to turn it off? Or is there a good reason to not want that behavior most of the time? My assumption is that it's not the default simply because it's a recent addition. By the way, I'm completely in favor of renaming commit to set-tree. +1 for that change.