From: Aaron Bentley Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:47:23 GMT Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Message-ID: <4540BC6B.1050009@utoronto.ca> In-Reply-To: <45408A53.10400@op5.se> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Ericsson wrote: > The only issue I have with bzr's revno's and truly distributed setup is > that, by looking at the table, it seems to claim that you have found > some miraculous way to make revnos work without a central server. Since > everyone agrees that they don't, this should IMO be listed as mutually > exclusive features. The "simple namespace" is both a URL and a revno. And therefore, it's just as distributed and decentralized as the web. There is very little difference between this: http://example.com/mywebpage#5 And this: http://example.com/mybranch 5 In fact, we've been planning to unify them into one identifier. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFQLxr0F+nu1YWqI0RAiVrAJ9rb+uylIuxqMo2VMelI3Qm6oNQOwCfeTAb kOkp9kOkRl1YEVEP+G3y2SU= =Zgsg