From: Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT) Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 05:37:26 GMT Subject: Re: perhaps time to remove git_blame from gitweb, and git-annotate? Message-ID: <45273D16.7050205@catalyst.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <20061006175234.41182.qmail@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Luben Tuikov wrote: >>>Do people have reason to favor annotate over blame? To keep >>>existing people's scripts working I think we should add a small >>>amount of code to blame.c to default to compatibility mode when >>>the command is called as git-annotate at least for a while, but >>>other than that I do not see much issue against scheduling for >>>annotate's removal. >> >>+1. Although I would leave git-annotate in git, if only to meet >>expectations of new git users. > > > I agree with Junio's assessment of the situation. +1 -- I need to test that the switch to git-blame for git-cvsserver works well for Eclipse end users. Will try and fit that next week somehow ;-) martin -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St OFFICE: +64(4)916-7224 MOB: +64(21)364-017 Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler - Einstein -----------------------------------------------------------------------