From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:42:24 GMT
Subject: Re: What will happen to git.git in the near future
Message-ID: <4516D190.3020608@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609242031410.25371@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
[...]
> I think that this could be done very efficiently (both in terms of time 
> and size) as a "pure" builtin, i.e. something with works as
> "git tar-tree", but not as "git-tar-tree". Of course, this would break 
> scripts using the latter instead of the former. Just my 2 yinyangs.

That would be a bug. If "git foo" works, then "git-foo" should also work.