From: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:42:09 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Add has_extension()
Message-ID: <44DB7E01.4000901@lsrfire.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20060810182117.GA13446@c165.ib.student.liu.se>

Fredrik Kuivinen schrieb:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0200, Rene Scharfe wrote:
>> +static inline int has_extension(const char *filename, int len,
>> const char *ext) +{ +	int extlen = strlen(ext); +	return len >
>> extlen && !memcmp(filename + len - extlen, ext, extlen); +} +
> 
> Wouldn't this function be much easier to use if len is computed from 
> filename with strlen? (after a quick look through the other patches I
>  couldn't find a call site where filename wasn't NUL-terminated)

Yes, it would be a bit easier, and my first version had only two
arguments.  Then I found out that the length of the first string is
already known at _all_ potential callsites, using this command to
identify candidates:

	$ grep 'cmp.*"\..*"' *.[ch]

We could add something like this:

	#define has_ext(a, b) has_extension(a, strlen(a), b)

to make it easier to use for code that doesn't already determine the
string length.  I think we should add it only after a user has been
identified, though.

Thanks,
René