From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 08:33:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] built-in "git grep" (git grip).
Message-ID: <44571967.7080807@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <e34cb4$is1$1@sea.gmane.org>

Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>Wouldn't "git ggrep" (from git-aware grep) or "git bgrep" (from built-in
>>grep), similar to the egrep and fgrep from the grep package?
> 
> 
> Yes, I understand, but I just don't like using 'grip'. And it would be nice
> to have some convention for further not-ready-yet built-in replacements for
> script versions of commands, for example adding letter 'b' as 'built-in' at
> the beginning of command name: 'bgrep', 'bdiff'. Or use postfix 'n' or
> '-ng' to denote transitionary not-ready-yet new version of command:
> 'grepn', 'diffn' or 'grep-ng', 'diff-ng'.
> 

Forcing the user to remember what's implemented as built-ins is not a 
good idea. It was for that exact reason the "git-<command>-script" were 
all renamed "git-<command>" once upon a time.

"git grip" work just fine for me, since it's only intended for testing 
and performance improvements so far. I also think it's clearer for 
end-users looking for a grep command if they're not faced with 
fgrep/egrep/ggrep/bgrep alongside plain "grep".

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231