From: John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:57:37 GMT
Subject: Re: Confusing git pull error message
Message-ID: <43d8ce650909131357m50428ffbs9c939be051254eb7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090913204231.GA8654@coredump.intra.peff.net>

2009/9/13 Jeff King <peff@peff.net>:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 01:38:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I saw some discussion on improving the wording.  Here is what I plan to
>> commit.
>
> Thanks for picking this up, I meant to re-post with improvements.
>
>> +     else
>> +             echo "Your configuration specifies to merge the ref"
>> +             echo "'${upstream#refs/heads/}' from the remote, but no such ref"
>> +             echo "was fetched."
>
> What you have here is precisely what we observed. But I think one of the
> complaints was to say more explicitly "that ref doesn't exist on the
> remote", which I think should be the case if we have got to this point
> (anything else would have triggered an error in fetch).

Yeah, it kinda sounds like git is just being lazy, and can't be
bothered to fetch it :-)