From: H. Peter Anvin Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:16:50 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-core-foo -> git-foo, except the core package Message-ID: <437A09F2.8080109@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <625fc13d0511150641k353d7128pf72f3542da601104@mail.gmail.com> Josh Boyer wrote: > On 11/15/05, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>This patch renames the tarball "git" rather than "git-core", and changes >>the names of various packages from git-core-foo to git-foo. git-core is >>still the true core package; an empty RPM package named "git" pulls in >>ALL the git packages -- this makes updates work correctly, and allows >>"yum install git" to do the obvious thing. > > What about "yum remove git" ? I don't think that will work quite so > well. The "git" package will be removed just fine since nothing > depends on it, but git- will still remain. Maybe not that big of > a deal, but it might not be obvious to some. True. If you have a solution to that, I'd love to hear it. Note that having the core package depend on everything else is not acceptable. > Also, what about http://www.gnu.org/software/git/git.html ? I seem to > recall that was the reason the name git-core was used in the first > place. It's changing its name to "gitfm". -hpa