From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:55:35 GMT
Subject: Re: The git protocol and DoS
Message-ID: <4356B2C7.601@zytor.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vmzl544f3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
> 
>>It would, however, require a protocol change; I would like to hear what 
>>people think about this at this stac=ge.
> 
> Well, it is full two days since a majorly visible git protocol
> enabled server has been announced, and you probably know what
> kind of hits you are getting (and please let us know if you have
> numbers, I am curious).

About 350 hits so far, total.  Utter peanuts.

> If we do a protocol change, earlier the
> better.  You already said that the kernel.org git is
> experimental.  Does anybody run git daemons and rely on the
> current protocol? 
 >
> I suspect it would not make *any* sense to have a backward
> compatible server that optionally allows this cookie exchange --
> attackers can just say "I am an older client".  OTOH, it
> probably makes sense to have an option on the client side to
> skip the cookie exchange stage.  I do not think autodetecting
> new/old server on the client side in connect.c is possible.
> 

You mean an option on the *server* to skip the cookie exchange?  If so, 
how would you expect the client to handle it?

	-hpa