From: H. Peter Anvin Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:07:44 GMT Subject: Re: Usage of isspace and friends Message-ID: <434E8650.7060604@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Yeah, and I agree, that was a mistake. It could have been fixed by making > EOF be MIN_INT (or any other value outside the range of either "unsigned > char" or "signed char" - preferably still negative), but there are > probably programs that depend on it being -1. > > The stupid thing I just posted doesn't care. It happens to return 0 for > EOF for all cases, but that's a side effect of (a) not doing locales (so > 255 is never printable or alpha) and (b) not even implementing iscntrl(). > Given that for isprint() et al are useless for non-ASCII UTF-8 anyway, might as well (they are not defined to be able to take wide character values.) -hpa