From: H. Peter Anvin Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:53:43 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc-4 warning in accept() call Message-ID: <433CD2E7.5090909@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <7vachv9kbq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Junio C Hamano wrote: > Pavel Roskin writes: > > >>gcc-4 warns about sign mismatch in pointers. Third argument in accept() >>is socklen_t, which is unsigned. Since Linus doesn't like socklen_t >>(see commit 7fa090844f7d1624c7d1ffc621aae6aec84a1110), let's use >>unsigned int. > > Based on the list comments, I'd drop this patch -- it appears > that gcc-4 warning is useless in this case. > No, it's not. The proper type, if you don't use socklen_t, is int, not unsigned int. -hpa