From: Tim Ottinger <tottinge@progeny.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:06:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] cache cursors: an introduction
Message-ID: <43272350.3060801@progeny.com>
In-Reply-To: <4325AED6.8050401@citi.umich.edu>

I know it's a little picky, but can we be consistently noun-verb-noun 
with these?
I'm not meaning to be a jerk (it just happens unbidden).

My reasons
1) My editor has word completion, which is handy.
2) However unimportant, I'm an old OO guy and object_cmd looks like 
object.command to me.
3) I'm so stupid I need consistent naming to help me learn the git guts.
4) I'm generally a butt about naming anyway 
(http://tottinge.blogsome.com/naming-rules/)
5) I work with a guy who is a stickler for lexicon, and he revived the 
passion for consistency.

> which describes a position in the cache.
>
> +  init_cc

cc_init?

>
> +  next_cc, prev_cc, cache_eof

cc_next, cc_previous

Which is that, cc_to_end or cc_at_end?

> +  next_name

cc_next_name?

>
> +  walk_cache

cache_walk?

The rest of those looked great.  I only listed the ones I was unsure about.


-- 
                             ><>
... either 'way ahead of the game, or 'way out in left field.