From: Phillip Wood Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 13:38:58 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] merge: remember conflict labels Message-ID: <42d3f663-6eff-4311-9bdb-d437a757bff5@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On 06/10/2026 16:46, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Phillip Wood writes: > >> @@ -4969,6 +4973,13 @@ void merge_switch_to_result(struct merge_options *opt, >> return; >> } >> trace2_region_leave("merge", "write_auto_merge", opt->repo); >> + >> + trace2_region_enter("merge", "write_merge_labels", opt->repo); >> + opt->priv = result->priv; >> + write_merge_labels(opt->repo, opt->priv->labels[0], opt->priv->labels[1], >> + opt->priv->labels[2]); >> + opt->priv = NULL; >> + trace2_region_leave("merge", "write_merge_labels", opt->repo); > > A "if (result->clean >= 0 && update_worktree_and_index)" condition > guards this code path, so we unconditionall call > write_merge_labels(), whether the result is clean or with conflict. > Am I reading the code correctly? Yes, I think so. Ouch! how did I miss that? Will fix, thanks Phillip >> @@ -5234,6 +5245,14 @@ static void move_opt_priv_to_result_priv(struct merge_options *opt, >> * to move it. >> */ >> assert(opt->priv && !result->priv); >> + if (!result->clean) { >> + opt->priv->labels[0] = >> + mem_pool_strdup(&opt->priv->pool, opt->ancestor); >> + opt->priv->labels[1] = >> + mem_pool_strdup(&opt->priv->pool, opt->branch1); >> + opt->priv->labels[2] = >> + mem_pool_strdup(&opt->priv->pool, opt->branch2); >> + } > > But we only populate the labels[] when conflicted. What would we > write when we do not have conflicts? > >> +int write_merge_labels(struct repository *r, const char *base, >> + const char *ours, const char *theirs) >> +{ >> + FILE *f = fopen_or_warn(git_path_merge_labels(r), "w"); >> + >> + if (!f) >> + return -1; >> + >> + fprintf(f, "%s\n%s\n%s\n", base, ours, theirs); >> + if (fclose(f)) >> + return error_errno("could not write '%s'", >> + git_path_merge_labels(r)); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} > > Would the answer be "(null)\n(null)\n(null)\n"?