From: David Greaves Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 21:26:02 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] core-git documentation update Message-ID: <427E83EA.2000104@dgreaves.com> In-Reply-To: <7vd5s15up8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Junio C Hamano wrote: >David, thanks for taking time to update the document. I ended >up hand merging your two patches since I had a bit more >documentation updates in git-jc tree, so I'd like you to >proofread the result. > > This merged fine. Purely for editorial consistency I added "" around the command - see patch The intention now was for me to go through Linus' HEAD and verify the docs actually documented the HEAD. Then I think comparing the HEAD to jit-jc and preparing patches for that? >It is my understanding that if I have a correct patch result >from your patch 1 and patch 2, I can throw away this message: > > Subject: [FILES] core-git documentation update > >Am I correct? > > yes - that was just to assist people in reading the docs without having to apply patches etc etc. >I intend to keep not-so-controvercial stuff in git-jc tree, so >that when Linus returns he can pull from it instead of patching >from a pile of e-mails, potentially risking to leave good stuff >in his mailbox during that process. > > I had hoped you'd pick this up in that manner - thanks David PS Removed Linus from cc Add quotes for editorial consistency Signed-off-by: David Greaves --- Documentation/core-git.txt: needs update Index: Documentation/core-git.txt =================================================================== --- 08cd7ce14ca4da7db37dce88e416e67b01f3452a/Documentation/core-git.txt (mode:100644 sha1:e046119fcdd948dec81b11376ec9198e76a109af) +++ uncommitted/Documentation/core-git.txt (mode:100644) @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ -m:: By default, files recorded in the index but not checked out are reported as deleted. This flag makes - git-diff-cache say that all non-checked-out files are up + "git-diff-cache" say that all non-checked-out files are up to date. Output format