From: Erik Faye-Lund Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:30:45 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cherry: support --abbrev option Message-ID: <40aa078e1003151530y19f10bf1l852a0e5230b11cb6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B9E69A4.2080304@lsrfire.ath.cx> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:08 PM, René Scharfe wrote: > Am 15.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Erik Faye-Lund: >> Switch to parse-options API while we're at it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund >> --- >> >> I sometimes find it useful to look at the commit-subject together with >> the SHA-1s. Using --abbrev increases the chance that the lines fits on >> an 80 character wide terminal, making the output easier to read. >> >>  builtin/log.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c >> index b70d0f7..020d618 100644 >> --- a/builtin/log.c >> +++ b/builtin/log.c >> @@ -1286,8 +1286,11 @@ static int add_pending_commit(const char *arg, struct rev_info *revs, int flags) >>       return -1; >>  } >> >> -static const char cherry_usage[] = >> -"git cherry [-v] [ [ []]]"; >> +static const char * const cherry_usage[] = { >> +     "git cherry [-v] [ [ []]]", >> +     NULL >> +}; >> + >>  int cmd_cherry(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >>  { >>       struct rev_info revs; >> @@ -1298,26 +1301,26 @@ int cmd_cherry(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >>       const char *upstream; >>       const char *head = "HEAD"; >>       const char *limit = NULL; >> -     int verbose = 0; >> +     int verbose = 0, abbrev = 40; >> >> -     if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-v")) { >> -             verbose = 1; >> -             argc--; >> -             argv++; >> -     } >> +     struct option options[] = { >> +             OPT__ABBREV(&abbrev), >> +             OPT__VERBOSE(&verbose), >> +             OPT_END() >> +     }; > > If I use --no-abbrev, do I get 0 or 40 hash chars?  I didn't actually > test it, but I suspect an "if (!abbrev) abbrev = 40;" is needed somewhere. > "abbrev" is initialized to 40 when declared, so you get the same behavior as before by default. >> -     if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) >> -             usage(cherry_usage); >> +     argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, cherry_usage, >> +         PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN); > > Why do you use PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN here? I think the old option > parsing code lazily relied on invalid options being found out by > add_pending_commit() later. We can be lazy again by leaving invalid > option handling to parse_options(); sure, it changes the error message, > but for the better. Actually, It's a mistake, thanks for pointing it out :) Yeah, I think your suggestion is better. Corrected. -- Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund