From: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:55:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater compatibility
Message-ID: <40aa078e0912291655m57ea0081vddf3b64bf27e1d02@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bdca99240912291649h1c727072q3b1e4099cab426df@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Sebastian Schuberth
<sschuberth@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 22:09, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> wrote:
>
>>> MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater
>>> compatibility
>>
>> Why this? Compatibility with what? What's the problem with the status quo?
>
> I wanted to include Hany's Dos2Unix tool (hd2u) into msysGit. h2du
> depends on libpopt, and either of the two requires the uid_t type, I
> do not recall which. And while adding the missing uid_t, I felt it
> would be right to actually use uid_t / pid_t in the function
> prototypes.
>

Perhaps I'm missing something here... why do you need to modify the
git-sources in order to include an external tool?

-- 
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund