From: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:25:02 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] builtin-apply: use warning() instead of fprintf(stderr, "warning: ")
Message-ID: <40aa078e0903231825w54c9dca2xc68a849d245916a4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9287282d966904f06ae4b3d7cfdf1d79eb645b69.1237856682.git.vmiklos@frugalware.org>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
> @@ -2932,8 +2932,7 @@ static int write_out_one_reject(struct patch *patch)
>        cnt = strlen(patch->new_name);
>        if (ARRAY_SIZE(namebuf) <= cnt + 5) {
>                cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(namebuf) - 5;
> -               fprintf(stderr,
> -                       "warning: truncating .rej filename to %.*s.rej",
> +               warning("truncating .rej filename to %.*s.rej",

Again, doesn't this change the output?

-- 
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund
kusmabite@gmail.com
(+47) 986 59 656