From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:55:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] worktree: include repair cmd in usage
Message-ID: <3f823608-adf4-f717-13d8-8da6f89a9506@sunshineco.com>
In-Reply-To: <pull.1188.git.1648231504463.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

On 3/25/22 2:05 PM, Des Preston via GitGitGadget wrote:
> The worktree repair command was not added to the usage menu for the
> worktree command. This commit adds the usage of 'worktree repair'
> according to the existing docs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Des Preston <despreston@gmail.com>

Thanks for fixing my oversight. This certainly should have been done by 
e8e1ff24c5 (worktree: add skeleton "repair" command, 2020-08-27).

One minor comment below...

> diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static const char * const worktree_usage[] = {
>   	N_("git worktree move <worktree> <new-path>"),
>   	N_("git worktree prune [<options>]"),
>   	N_("git worktree remove [<options>] <worktree>"),
> +	N_("git worktree repair [<path>]"),
>   	N_("git worktree unlock <path>"),

The usage message should reflect the fact that `git worktree repair` can 
accept multiple paths, thus:

     N_("git worktree repair [<path>...]"),

which would also make it consistent with the synopsis in 
Documentation/worktree.txt.

With that change applied, consider this:

     Acked-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>