From: Daniel Martí Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 22:45:03 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] credential/libsecret: load secrets explicitly Message-ID: <3cae7bd6-33fa-4695-bf4e-9f473ac98042@mvdan.cc> In-Reply-To: On 9/24/26 8:00 AM, M Hickford wrote: > Is this an upstream bug in libsecret? > > The libsecret docs for SECRET_SEARCH_LOAD_SECRETS are unfortunately > truncated https://gnome.pages.gitlab.gnome.org/libsecret/method.Service.search_sync.html Partly. The truncated sentence is a docs bug, which I've sent a fix for: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsecret/-/merge_requests/182 The behavior itself looks intentional, though. The search does not load secrets of locked items, and just like a failed unlock, a failed load does not fail the search; secret_item_get_secret() is documented to return NULL for a locked or unloaded item. The daemon side is deliberate too: gnome-keyring's GetSecrets skips items which are locked or no longer exist, whereas GetSecret on a single item returns an error. So git needs to handle a NULL secret either way, including with every libsecret release out there. libsecret's own secret-tool also loads each secret explicitly after searching, which is what this patch does. I'll send a v2 with a reworded commit message shortly. Thanks!