From: Phillip Wood Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:10:10 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2020, #10; Tue, 31) Message-ID: <3b472af5-2b23-a155-78b5-cf28c3494864@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Hi Junio On 01/04/2020 00:04, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with > '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of > the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. > > [...] > > * dl/merge-autostash (2020-03-24) 19 commits > - pull: pass --autostash to merge > - t5520: make test_pull_autostash() accept expect_parent_num > - merge: teach --autostash option > - sequencer: implement save_autostash() > - sequencer: unlink autostash in apply_autostash() > - sequencer: extract perform_autostash() from rebase > - rebase: generify create_autostash() > - rebase: extract create_autostash() > - reset: extract reset_head() from rebase > - rebase: generify reset_head() > - rebase: use apply_autostash() from sequencer.c > - sequencer: make apply_rebase() accept a path > - rebase: use read_oneliner() > - sequencer: make read_oneliner() extern > - sequencer: configurably warn on non-existent files > - sequencer: make read_oneliner() accept flags > - sequencer: use file strbuf for read_oneliner() > - t7600: use test_write_lines() > - Makefile: ASCII-sort += lists > > "git merge" learns the "--autostash" option. > > Will merge to 'next'. I've posted some comments on this today, I'm not sure about the behavior of 'git reset' after 'git merge --autostash' Best Wishes Phillip