From: Jeff Whiteside Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:22:07 GMT Subject: Re: for newbs = little exercise / tutorial / warmup for windows and other non-sophisticated new Git users :-) [Scanned] Message-ID: <3ab397d0812301822p34a021b1w6799a9de9a4ffeb4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: wtf is wrong with git checkout ?? if you must have git checkout then instead use git checkout git clean but you will lose other files that aren't part of the repo but are still in the project's dir (i.e. untracked files). On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Conor Rafferty wrote: > >> I don't understand, sorry. I thought I'd already removed all files from >> the local tree, in the $ rm *.* move just above the checkout > > That removes them from the filesystem, but they're still in the index. And > "git checkout ." first gets everything that *is* in "." in > into the index, and then gets everything from "." in the index > into the filesystem. > > I suppose it is questionable as to whether it ought to copy paths that > aren't in versionA from the index into the filesystem. > > To see this in a bit more detail, do: > > $ rm *.* > $ git status > (notice that the deletes are in the "won't be committed" section) > > Now, "git checkout " will discard any changes in the "won't be > committed" section for that path. Maybe "git checkout versionA " > should only discard changes that are in the "won't be committed" section > for filenames that match that path and are in versionA (or are > *different* in versionA and not removed?), but I think it's an area where, > if you're expecting any particular behavior out of that command, you're > likely to be surprised in some way in some situation. > > -Daniel > *This .sig left intentionally blank* > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >