From: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 17:39:39 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2018, #01; Thu, 1)
Message-ID: <3C32011B-30E5-4E63-8692-5D598430DC99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsh9icsh1.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>


> On 02 Mar 2018, at 18:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
>> SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> * sg/travis-build-during-script-phase (2018-01-08) 1 commit
>>>> - travis-ci: build Git during the 'script' phase
>>>> 
>>>> Stalled for too long without any response; will discard.
>>> 
>>> I still think this is a good change as-is and it does make checking the
>>> results of Travis CI builds easier.  The issue Lars raised in [1] is in
>>> my opinion a non-issue [2] in practice and Lars hasn't yet disagreed
>>> with that.
>> 
>> OK, so I simply misread the discussion and did not realize that it
>> reached a conclusion?  If that's the case, good ;-).  Thanks.
> 
> OK, I think I now understand what happened.  I misread the "fold"
> discussion and thought we were still exploring the possibility, to
> avoid showing uninteresting zero-status case to the users.
> 
> If we do not care about that part, then it seems that the discussion
> thread is complete.  Let's move on.

All good with me. I just wanted explain my reasoning for the initial
implementation. I do understand Szeder's reasoning too and I am OK
with the change.

Thanks for improving the TravisCI integration Szeder!

- Lars