From: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 22:45:10 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimized cvsexportcommit: calling 'cvs status' only once instead of once per changed file.
Message-ID: <380B28A3-5CD0-4371-A717-1D2629E6302D@zib.de>
In-Reply-To: <200705092230.16027.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>


On May 9, 2007, at 10:30 PM, Robin Rosenberg wrote:

> onsdag 09 maj 2007 skrev Steffen Prohaska:
>> The old implementation executed 'cvs status' for each file touched by
>> the patch
>> to be applied. The new code calls 'cvs status' only once and parses
>> cvs's
>> output to collect status information of all files contained in the
>> cvs working
>> copy.
>>
>> Runtime is now independent of the number of modified files. A
>> drawback is that
>> the new code retrieves status information for all files even if only
>> a few are
>> touched. The old implementation may be noticeably faster for small
>> patches to
>
> Ouch, lets see now. My working cvs checkout contains ~25k files and
> my typical commit touches 5-20 files.
>
> A quick (well....) test says cvs status on my checkout takes about
> five minutes to execute. Compare this with my typical exportcommit
> time of about ten seconds.

I tested with ~7k files using ssh to connect. Maybe something's wrong
with the server I'm connecting to but it takes some time for each  
connect.
This alone kills the performance for a couple of files.

'cvs -z6 status' on the other hand took only 10 seconds.

> If you really need this, make a switch to select it.

I'll post a patch soon that takes the best of both: Call cvs status
once with the list of touched files and parse the output. Only one
connection is needed and only the minimal amount of status data is
transferred.

- Steffen