From: Pieter de Bie Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:40:42 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #07; Wed, 28) Message-ID: <351A6988-32EB-473F-B6E5-8FBB38D91F88@ai.rug.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090129113735.GA6505@coredump.intra.peff.net> On 29 jan 2009, at 11:37, Jeff King wrote: > git push origin master ;# note we have to explicitly mention the > branch > > ... time passes ... > > git pull > > produces the "you haven't asked me which branch to merge" message. > > Which does make some sense, given how tracking configuration is set > up. > It's just that it's a little sad that cloning an empty repository and > then later getting commits out of it (whether commits you put in or > somebody else) does not behave the same as cloning a repository with > commits. This is true in all cases. If you create a new branch in any repository, push that, and later do a 'git pull', you get that message. I agree it's not the nicest way to handle things, but this is not an issue with the clone, it's an issue of pushing new branches in general.