From: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 19:45:18 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clone: add `--seed` shorthand
Message-ID: <3516DC60279A42188EE2AA394921FC70@PhilipOakley>
In-Reply-To: <8895881cd3f324d2b8a827e311296a48@www.dscho.org>

From: "Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> Hi Peff,
>
> On 2015-05-21 06:16, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt 
>> b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
>> index f1f2a3f..ffeb03b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
>> @@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ objects from the source repository into a pack in
>> the cloned repository.
>>  transfer and stop borrowing from them after a clone is made
>>  by making necessary local copies of borrowed objects.
>>
>> +--seed <repository>::
>> + A convenient shorthand for `--dissociate --reference=<repository>`.
>> +
>
> Since you want to advertise this as an easier way than 
> `--dissociate --reference=<repository>`, it might make sense to avoid 
> sending the reader that way, too.
>
> Maybe something like
>
> --seed <repository>::
>    Fetch objects from <repository> instead of the clone URL when 
> possible. This is useful when a (possibly partial) clone already 
> exists locally, to avoid transferring the same objects again.
>

Would it be worth mentioning here that a bundle is a satisfactory 
alternative to repository?

+--seed <repository|bundle>::
+    Fetch objects from <repository> or <bundle> instead of the clone 
URL when possible. This is useful when a (possibly partial) clone 
already exists locally, to avoid transferring the same objects again.

I haven't checked if the invocation would accept a bundle filename, but 
I'm presuming it can in the same way that clone does.

--
Philip