From: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:37:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] config: allow specifying config entries via envvar pairs
Message-ID: <32a5617e-49b8-c6e9-4b1e-09e77bcae8fa@iee.email>
In-Reply-To: <44e8dd50c6ea7cbcc5e4fc35c9b9057c0a52038c.1605269465.git.ps@pks.im>

On 13/11/2020 12:16, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> This commit thus adds a new way of adding config entries via the
> environment which doesn't require splitting of keys and values. The user
> can specify an config entry's key via `GIT_CONFIG_KEY_$n` and a value
> via `GIT_CONFIG_VALUE_$n`, where `n` is any number starting with 1. It
> is possible to add multiple entries via consecutively numbered envvars
> `GIT_CONFIG_KEY_1`, `GIT_CONFIG_KEY_2`, etc, where each of the keys may
> have a matching value. 

> When no matching value exists, it's assumed to be
> the empty value.
Is this a good choice of default in the face of potential mistyping when
entering commands, or cut&paste editing of scripts. It's easy to see
cases of mismatched KEY_2 VALUE_1 entries.

Wouldn't it be better to warn about un-matched key/value pairs?


> +GIT_CONFIG_KEY_1,GIT_CONFIG_VALUE_1::

Shouldn't the man page entry indicate that it's '<n>'  ?

Philip