From: Philip Oakley Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:08:14 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/8] [DO NOT APPLY, but improve?] rebase--interactive: introduce "stop" command Message-ID: <32EA49C74ECD470F8EE898D965833E02@PhilipOakley> In-Reply-To: From: "Jacob Keller" > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Stefan Beller > wrote: >> Jake suggested using "x false" instead of "edit" for some corner cases. >> >> I do prefer using "x false" for all kinds of things such as stopping >> before a commit (edit only let's you stop after a commit), and the >> knowledge that "x false" does the least amount of actions behind my back. >> >> We should have that command as well, maybe? >> > > > I agree. I use "x false" very often, and I think stop is probably a > better solution since it avoids spawning an extra shell that will just > fail. Not sure if stop implies too much about "stop the whole thing" > as opposed to "stop here and let me do something manual", but I think > it's clear enough. > 'hold' or 'pause' maybe options (leads to http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/put+on+hold offering procastinate etc.) 'adjourn'. > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller >> --- >> git-rebase--interactive.sh | 1 + >> sequencer.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh >> index 3cd7446d0b..9eac53f0c5 100644 >> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh >> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh >> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ l, label