From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:21:33 GMT
Subject: Re: Feature Request: Branch Annotations
Message-ID: <32541b130810081621k32493e20occba9cd97671775d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vwsgiptph.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 10/8/08, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> David Soria Parra <sn_@gmx.net> writes:
>
>  >> Any opinions on this?
>  >
>  > would be great to have something like that build in git-core like
>  >
>  > git branch -i 'Fix bla' ds/fix next
>  > git branch -i
>  >  ds/fix (Fix Bla)
>
> Haven't people watched Linus on google tech talk?  Here is an excerpt from
>  the transcript (http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/LinusTalk200705Transcript):
>
>     ... well actually you shouldn't call it "test", you should basically
>     name your branches the way you name your functions, you should call
>     them something short and sweet and to the point -- What is that branch
>     doing.
>
>  IOW, why did you name the branch "ds/fix" and not "ds/fix-bla"?

Because it would be excessive typing every time you want to do
something to that branch?

I guess bash completions would help with this (if you're using bash),
but even then it's kind of unreasonable to name branches something
like "bug-111234-widget-performance-improvements-for-customer-x",
which is the sort of information that would be awfully helpful two
months later when you're looking at old unmerged branches.

Avery