From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 14:19:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/24] multi-pack-index: load into memory
Message-ID: <2bb2a12f-f22d-990b-636c-73b2b805d12d@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfu1aodw3.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 6/25/2018 3:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:
>> +	cat >expect <<- EOF
> "<<-\EOF", i.e. make it easy for readers to spot that there is no
> funny substitutions happening in the here-doc body.

While I don't use substitutions in this patch, I do use them in later 
patches. Here is the final version of this method:

midx_read_expect () {
         NUM_PACKS=$1
         NUM_OBJECTS=$2
         NUM_CHUNKS=$3
         OBJECT_DIR=$4
         EXTRA_CHUNKS="$5"
         cat >expect <<-\EOF
         header: 4d494458 1 $NUM_CHUNKS $NUM_PACKS
         chunks: pack_names oid_fanout oid_lookup 
object_offsets$EXTRA_CHUNKS
         num_objects: $NUM_OBJECTS
         packs:
         EOF
         if [ $NUM_PACKS -ge 1 ]
         then
                 ls $OBJECT_DIR/pack/ | grep idx | sort >> expect
         fi
         printf "object_dir: $OBJECT_DIR\n" >>expect &&
         test-tool read-midx $OBJECT_DIR >actual &&
         test_cmp expect actual
}

Using <<-\EOF causes these substitutions to fail. Is there a different 
way I should construct this method?

Thanks,
-Stolee