From: Brian Scott Dobrovodsky <brian@pontech.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:56 GMT
Subject: Re: Data Integrity & un-Commited Branches
Message-ID: <2a8a071a0709141740l144b60aevdfec2b6cdab8bb60@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vk5qtd3le.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

It was a misunderstanding of Git's work flow. By switching from 'an
un-committed demo' to a previously committed master: I was expecting
Git to give me the content last commited to master while at the same
time preserving(without having to commit) the changes made in demo.
Intuitively, this is how I expected Git to function.

Indeed, I read through the Crash Courses: 'Git for everyone' & 'Git
for SVN users'.
-- 
Brian Scott Dobrovodsky