From: Rostislav Svoboda Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:19:51 GMT Subject: Re: Best way to merge two repos with same content, different history Message-ID: <286817520906051019k78dc002cg8006987a7258b6de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F794303117DC1@emailmn.mqsoftware.com> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 19:10, Kelly F. Hickel wrote: > Bost, >        Thanks, but I'm already working with a local copy of the CVS repo.  I've corresponded with Michael Haggerty about the time this takes, and there just doesn't seem to be any way to improve the speed, without making some fairly drastic changes to cvs2git. uhm, see below Bost On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 14:55, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> If you do not have filesystem access to your CVS repository, you might >> be able to clone it using CVSSuck [2,3]. > > A substantially faster option would be to go with cvsclone: > > http://samba.org/ftp/tridge/rtc/cvsclone.l > > (in my case, cvsclone was not only faster, but it actually worked, too, > which is more than I could say of CVSSuck).